Priorities and preferences of people with schizophrenia: need for new focus

Priorities are what people value, and preferences show how they make trade-offs between one outcome and another. Both are important if we want to understand how people with schizophrenia make choices about treatment. Understanding patients’ views is vital if we want to encourage adherence. For patients, clarity of thought and minimizing symptoms are highly important outcomes.

When schizophrenia patients were asked about their priorities in achieving a successful outcome, 80% rated being able to think clearly as highly important. Not surprisingly, this was followed by minimization of symptoms and engaging in social activities. Unwanted side-effects of treatment, including weight gain and sexual problems, were relatively low on the list, a somewhat surprising finding, said John Bridges (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA). This may suggest that poor adherence to treatment may be due more to lack of focus on improving thinking and minimizing symptoms than it is to do with problems of tolerability.

People with schizophrenia are able to express their priorities and discuss trade-offs between outcomes

Discordance of view

Professor Bridges’ research has established a list of priorities that physicians undervalue when compared to patients. These include improved satisfaction, independence, physical health, activities of daily living and capacity for work. Many are tangible outcomes and relate to function.

Among the priorities that physicians overvalue relative to patients are decreased psychotic symptoms, improved self-confidence, improved capacity for communication and emotion, and decreased mistrust and hostility. To some extent these are “textbook” outcomes, explained John Bridges.

Patient priorities may be used to guide clinical trial design and inform regulatory decisions

Lack of concordance between patients and their physicians when setting goals can lead to poor compliance with therapy. The other side of the coin is that clinicians who can relate the potential impact of drug therapy to outcomes specifically valued by their patients may find better levels of adherence. It is also part of good, patient-tailored management.

Patient-focused drug development

Systematically eliciting the views of patients with schizophrenia is now seen as increasingly important in making treatment decisions, and in understanding patient response. Shared decision making can help achieve satisfactory outcomes.

But this approach may also be helpful in a wider context -- when selecting endpoints in clinical trials, when making regulatory decisions, and in the development of new treatments. Patient-focused drug development, for example, is an idea that is gaining ground.

People with schizophrenia are able to express their priorities and discuss trade-offs between outcomes; and these views can be elicited through stated-preference methodology. They also have opinions on the way mode of drug administration may influence their adherence. For example, patients with problems adhering to treatment place a higher value on an injectable – rather than oral -- formulation than those who are adherent.

Level of adherence affects formulation preferences

Physician preferences also change according to how adherent a patient is: as adherence declines, a longer-acting mode of administration comes to be viewed as more important.

This is a report of an Otsuka and Lundbeck-sponsored satellite symposium chaired by Professor Robin Emsley (Cape Town, South Africa), during ECNP 2017.

Our correspondent’s highlights from the symposium are meant as a fair representation of the scientific content presented. The views and opinions expressed on this page do not necessarily reflect those of Otsuka and Lundbeck.

Symposium references
  1. Kinter ET, Schmeding A, Rudolph I, dosReis S, Bridges JF. Identifying patient-relevant endpoints among individuals with schizophrenia: an application of patient-centered health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jan;25(1):35-41.
  2. Bridges JF, Slawik L, Schmeding A, Reimer J, Naber D, Kuhnigk O. A test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia. Health Expect. 2013 Jun;16(2):164-76.
  3. Bridges JF, Kinter ET, Schmeding A, Rudolph I, Mühlbacher A. Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks? Patient. 2011;4(4):267-75.
  4. Levitan B, Markowitz M, Mohamed AF, Johnson FR, Alphs L, Citrome L, Bridges JF. Patients' Preferences Related to Benefits, Risks, and Formulations of Schizophrenia Treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jul;66(7):719-26.
  5. Beusterien K, Chan E, Such P, Laird AD, Loze J, Nylander A, Robinson P, Bridges JF. Developing and Testing A Stated-Preference Instrument to Prioritize Treatment Goals Among Patients with Recent Onset Schizophrenia. ISPOR 19th Annual European Congress, Vienna, Austria.
Country selection
We are registering that you are located in Brazil - if that's correct then please continue to Progress in Mind Brazil
You are leaving Progress in Mind
Please confirm your email
We have just sent you an email, with a confirmation link.
Before you can gain full access - you need to confirm your email.
The information on this site is exclusively intented for health care professionals.
All the information included in the Website is related to products of the local market and, therefore, directed to health professionals legally authorized to prescribe or dispense medications with professional practice. The technical information of the drugs is provided merely informative, being the responsibility of the professionals authorized to prescribe drugs and decide, in each concrete case, the most appropriate treatment to the needs of the patient.
Register for access to Progress in Mind in your country